viernes, 28 de julio de 2017

Camaradas en acción

Como todo camarada del Partido ya debe saber, hace pocos días se reunió en Washington, en la House of Representatives, el pleno del Secretariado General a los efectos de sancionar una nueva ley de castigo a la potencia revisionista rusa. La nueva ley, cargada de sanciones acorde con el pensamiento estratégico del Politburó de la Revolución Capitalista Globalizada, fue adecuadamente votada por 419 votos a favor contra tres en contra. Estos últimos ya fueron convenientemente hospitalizados para su reeducación. Así lo informa Michael Krieger para el sitio web Liberty

Título: The U.S. Empire Continues to Stumble Towards Ruin


"There is a true law, a right reason, conformable to nature, universal, unchangeable, eternal, whose commands urge us to duty, and whose prohibitions restrain us from evil. Whether it enjoins or forbids, the good respect its injunctions, and the wicked treat them with indifference. This law cannot be contradicted by any other law, and is not liable either to derogation or abrogation.

Neither the senate nor the people can give us any dispensation for not obeying this universal law of justice. It needs no other expositor and interpreter than our own conscience. It is not one thing at Rome and another at Athens; one thing today and another tomorrow; but in all times and nations this universal law must for ever reign, eternal and imperishable. It is the sovereign master and emperor of all beings. God himself is its author,—its promulgator,—its enforcer. He who obeys it not, flies from himself, and does violence to the very nature of man. For his crime he must endure the severest penalties hereafter, even if he avoid the usual misfortunes of the present life."

– Marcus Tullius Cicero

There’s been a lot going on this week, so it’s unsurprising that an extremely important vote in Congress failed to get the attention it deserves. What I’m referring to is the recent Russia/Iran/North Korea sanctions bill passed by the House of Representatives in a frighteningly lopsided 419-3 vote.

Let’s turn to Bloomberg for a quick analysis on the Russian reaction:

Russia threatened to retaliate against new sanctions passed by the U.S. House of Representatives, saying they made it all but impossible to achieve the Trump administration’s goal of improved relations.

The measures push U.S.-Russia ties into uncharted territory and “don’t leave room for the normalization of relations” in the foreseeable future, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said Wednesday, according to the Interfax news service.

Hope “is dying” for improved relations because the scale of “the anti-Russian consensus in Congress makes dialogue impossible and for a long time,” Konstantin Kosachyov, chairman of the international affairs committee in Russia’s upper house of parliament, said on Facebook. Russia should prepare a response to the sanctions that’s “painful for the Americans,” he said.

The bill, passed by a vote of 419-3 on Tuesday, would strengthen sanctions against Russia less than three weeks after President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin held their first official meeting at the Group of 20 summit. The measure, which now goes to the Senate, would let Congress block any effort by Trump to unilaterally weaken sanctions imposed under the Obama administration for Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential elections and its support for separatists in Ukraine. The White House has sent mixed signals about whether Trump will sign the bill.

U.S. Senator Bob Corker of Tennessee, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said Wednesday that senators want to examine North Korea sanctions added to the bill by the House. If senators insist on changes to the bill, passage could be delayed, possibly until September, when lawmakers return from a recess.

“We all want this to become law before we leave here for the recess,” Corker told reporters in Washington. He added: “The White House doesn’t like this bill. The State Department doesn’t like this bill. This bill is going to become law, OK.”

The sanctions are “pretty sad from the viewpoint of Russian-American relations and prospects for developing them, and no less depressing from the perspective of international law and international trade,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters Wednesday on a conference call. Putin will decide on a response if the bill becomes law, he said.

Trump will sign the law because “he’s a prisoner of Congress and anti-Russian hysteria,” Alexei Pushkov, a senator in Russia’s upper house of parliament, said on Twitter. The sanctions are “a new stage of confrontation,” he said.

Russia has prepared “economic and political measures that will be adopted if the Senate and Trump support the bill,” said Vladimir Dzhabarov, deputy chairman of the international affairs committee in the upper house, the RIA Novosti news service reported. Relations with the U.S. “are at such a low level that we have nothing to lose” by retaliating, he said.

To summarize, the entire House of Representatives other than three Republicans, Justin Amash of Michigan, Thomas Massie of Kentucky, and John Duncan of Tennessee, voted for this thing. Not a single Democrat voted against the sanctions.

We supposedly live in a “representative democracy,” but 99% of our so-called representatives voted for this bill. Does this really represent the will of 99% of the public? These are the kind of numbers you’d expect to see in totalitarian states, and the ironic thing is the vote was driven by a desire to put a stop to supposedly fascist Trump. We’ve got much bigger problems than Trump.

Michael Tracey put it perfectly on Twitter earlier today:

Michael Tracey ? @mtracey
The complete conformity of views in the political/media class re: sanctions -- virtually no dissent at all -- should be a major warning sign
7:34 PM - Jul 26, 2017

As troubling as the bill is for relations with nuclear armed Russia where tensions are already high, the response from European allies is arguably more concerning.

As much as I hate to quote CNN, it actually published a pretty good article on the subject. Here’s some of it:

The European Union has delivered a stern warning to the US over a plan to impose new sanctions on Russia, opening up the prospect of a rift between the two allies over how to deal with Moscow’s foreign interventions.

EU President Jean-Claude Juncker said the bloc would act “within days” if it does not receive reassurances on the potential impact of new sanctions on European interests.

The EU has previously coordinated with the US over sanctions in response to Russia’s annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. But it fears the latest measures could hit companies that are involved in the financing of a controversial new pipeline, Nord Stream 2, that would carry natural gas from Russia to Germany.

Juncker said the bill could have “unintended unilateral effects” on the EU’s energy security. “This is why the Commission concluded today that if our concerns are not taken into account sufficiently, we stand ready to act appropriately within a matter of days,” Juncker said. “America first cannot mean that Europe’s interests come last.”

Germany, which strongly backs the new pipeline, said it was concerned over the sanctions. It would be “unacceptable for the United States to use possible sanctions as an instrument to serve the interests of US industry policies,” Foreign Ministry spokesman Martin Schäfer said Wednesday.

France called the US bill “unlawful” due to its “extraterritorial reach,” saying it could impact Europeans if enacted. “We have challenged similar texts in the past,” the Foreign Ministry said in a statement. “To protect ourselves against the extraterritorial effects of US legislation, we will have to work on adjusting our French and European laws.”

The European Union expressed frustration that it had not been consulted over the new proposals. “New sanctions should always be coordinated between allies,” EU President Jean-Claude Juncker said in a statement.

The EU and the US imposed coordinated sanctions in 2014 over Russia’s annexation of Crimea from Ukraine. President Barack Obama imposed further sanctions in late 2016 over alleged interference in the 2016 US election. Sanctions were also imposed under the 2012 Magnitsky Act, which targets Russians whom the US considers human rights abusers.

These are major EU allies furious with this bill, which makes you ask the obvious followup question. Did 99% of the House of Representatives not realize the implications of what they were voting for in their blind rage against Russia? If so, these people are extremely dangerous and have no business making important decisions for 320 million of us.

This is exactly how empires implode. Corrupt, power-drunk , disconnected elites living in an echo chamber of hubris always destroy everything in their path at the end of a geopolitical cycle. First they lose the trust of their own people (this has already happened), and then they lose the trust of their allies. This last part is happening rapidly and it’s moving much faster than even I imagined.

Unless something major changes we have to assume the U.S. empire is going down, and need to start thinking about what a post-imperial America can look like. There are countless dangers in such a scenario, but also many opportunities for a vastly improved and freer society.

3 comentarios:

  1. Es más o menos obvio que los congresistas votan sometidos a influencias y condicionamientos terribles. Algunos son ignorantes y crédulos. Otros son vivillos que creen que siguiendo la corriente de la rusofobia van a sobrevivir políticamente un poco más. Y otros son sencillamente corruptos o débiles que sucumben a las presiones.

    Pero la rusofobia no salió del Congreso de USA, salió de otras usinas que influencian y tuercen la agenda del Congreso.

    Resulta ya bastante claro que el establishment "público-privado" que domina la geopolítica en USA perdió el control en la cúspide del Ejecutivo de ese país, y lo conserva en el Legislativo y Judicial.

    En otras palabras, hay un Presidente que intenta intervenir en el Estado oligárquico -a pesar de todas sus contradicciones- y es duramente combatido por éste.

    Los otros días trascendieron declaraciones de Putin a un periodista occidental (creo que era británico) en el marco de una entrevista en la que se revela en el entrelíneas de las preguntas que le formulaban la obsesión por saber si había habido una reunión secreta o clandestina entre él y Trump en la cumbre de Hamburgo, más allá de la que había trascendido públicamente. Esto revela la profunda desconfianza en la estrategia personal que sigue Trump para con los rusos, por un lado, y, por otro lado, lo sensible que es esta cuestión para el establishment occidental.

  2. Muy buena presentación, y también el comentario de OTI. Les dejo un artículo que especula sobre el veto de Trump:

  3. Que esto nos sirva de lección, porque después, en unos años, van a aparecer historiadores y análisis de todas clases diciendo que la guerra la empezó el pueblo norteamericano. El mismo tipo de análisis que plantea que el pueblo alemán apoyó a Hitler.

    Si alguien me secuestra y nos apunta con un arma en la cabeza y luego me llevan a robar un banco como rehén, no voy a admitir que luego digan que yo era cómplice de los ladrones.

    Sin embargo, los historiadores dirán que yo estaba con los ladrones robando un Banco. Es increíble pero es así, lamentablemente.

    Se dice que los alemanes "apoyaron" a Hitler, y no se hace la sencilla pregunta: "¿en qué condiciones?". Yo "acompañé" a los ladrones a robar el Banco, pero "¿en qué condiciones?.

    Se me podrá decir Hitler sacó el 44% de los votos en 1933, ah sí, cierto. Y cuatro meses antes qué pasó? Perdió en las elecciones de fines de 1932 un par de millones de votos respecto a la de mediados de 1932. ¿Cómo puede ser? ¿No era que el pueblo apoyaba a Hitler? ¿No será que lo apoyaba cada vez menos y que luego vinieron las intervenciones de los poderes de trastienda para salvarlo y forzar su acceso al poder y la dictadura, la que luego se "legitimaría" con las elecciones de 1933 pero en un contexto de dictadura, persecución y asesinato de todos los opositores civiles y militares?.

    ¿Así cualquier gana elecciones, no?

    Los nazis de Ucrania también pueden ganar elecciones si quisieran.

    Bueno, en USA el método es más o menos lo mismo pero manteniendo más las formas. Los poderes de trastienda socavan y deslegitiman la victoria de Trump en las elecciones, ejercen presiones tremendas sobre el Congreso y, probablemente, si Trump no se doblega, lo sometan a juicio político y tenga que salir de la Presidencia.

    Luego, la geopolítica de la guerra estará en la cima del Ejecutivo estadounidense y se encaminará todo de nuevo en dirección de la guerra con Rusia y China sin estorbos del jefe del Ejecutivo.

    Y, si hay una guerra nuclear y algún historiador sobrevive, luego de 20 o 30 años dirá: "el pueblo estadounidense era antiruso", miren las votaciones en el Congreso, el clamor de la "opinión pública(da)" contra Trump que es amigo de los rusos, etc., etc. Y aportará como prueba los diarios de la época (si queda alguno que no se haya quemado por la explosión nuclear), las manifestaciones contra Trump, el resultado registrado de los votos en el Congreso a favor de las sanciones a Rusia, etc., etc.

    Y se olvidarán de la sencilla pregunta: ¿en qué condiciones?.