lunes, 26 de noviembre de 2018

Mientras tanto, en el Mar de Azov...


Noticias de ayer y hoy dan cuenta de nuevas fricciones entre Rusia y Ucrania, esta vez en el Estrecho de Kerch, que da acceso al Mar de Azov desde el Mar Negro. Tres embarcaciones livianas de Ucrania fueron detenidas por fuerzas navales rusas en momentos en que se disponían a cruzar el estrecho sin  previa autorización. La nota que sigue es del sitio web Moon of Alabama:



Título: Russia Blocks Ukrainian Navy From Militarizing The Sea of Azov - Updated

Texto: The Ukrainian government under the oligarch Petro Poroshenko is in election campaign mode. That is one reason why it is launching new provocations against Russia. Yesterday Ukrainian forces reportedly occupied a town within the neutral zone between the government controlled part and the rebel held Donetsk area. Today the Ukrainian navy sent a tug and two small gun boats, Ukrainian build Gurza-M class types, to pass through the Kerch Strait into the Sea of Azov.

When the ships entered Russian waters without announcing their intent, a Russian coast guard ship rammed (vid) and damaged the tug. The two gun boats escaped but did not pass the strait. The pictures show the melee at sea. 

With Crimea back in Russian hands, the Kerch Strait is solely Russian territorial water. The Treaty on the Legal Status of the Sea of Azov and the Kerch Strait, signed in 2003 by Russia and the Ukraine, provides that military ship entry into the sea is only allowed with mutual consent. Ukraine disputes the status of the sea in an arbitration court.

The Ukrainian government, urged on by the U.S., wants to establish a new military harbor in the Sea of Azov. Two of its navy ships, a rescue vessel and a tug, passed through the street on September 23. In October the Russian government warned that it will not allow any further militarization of the sea. Some U.S. hawks even want NATO ships to enter the Sea of Azov. The Sea of Azov has a maximum depth of 7 meters. Typical U.S. frigates have a draft of 10+ meters. What NATO or U.S. ship could even go there? As Russia firmly controls the sole entry point into the sea and can easily attack any ship in the Sea of Azov from within its borders the idea is incredibly stupid.

The Kerch Strait is now blocked by a large cargo ship the Russians anchored under the new Kerch bridge.

The Ukrainian provocation may well be aimed to sour the meeting between President Trump and Putin that is planned for November 30 during the G20 summit in Argentina. It should be more careful. It is quite possible that Russia will block commercial traffic to the Ukrainian port of Mariupol over any further incident. The big loser of this useless provocation would then again be the Ukraine.


---


Update - Nov. 26, 6:00 utc

The Russian coast guard detained the three Ukrainian ships and their crews in Russian waters. They again illegally attempted to cross from the Black Sea through the Kerch Strait into the Sea of Azov. The Ukrainian side says the two of its seaman were injured.

Since Crimea voted to again become a part of Russia the Kerch Strait is Russian territorial water. Ships can pass the strait but are required to take on a pilot and to undergo inspections if the Russian coast guard demand such. The Ukrainian side understands that these are legal measures. In a report by the U.S. government outlet RFL/RE published in August the Ukrainian side admitted as much:

[The Ukrainian Sea Guard and the squadron's spokesman] Poliakov said that, while Russia's actions are "provocative," because of a controversial 2003 agreement on cooperation and shared use of the Sea of Azov and Kerch Strait, "everything Russia is doing here is technically legal."

The three Ukrainian ships tried to pass Russian waters without informing Russian authorities and without taking on pilots. Since Russia build the $3.7 billion Kerch bridge which connects Crimea with Russia, U.S. commentators and Ukrainian politicians threatened to blow up the bridge. The Russian are understandably carefully about any traffic near to it.

Following yesterday's incident the president of the Ukraine Pedro Poroshenko proposed to declare martial law. The parliament will have to decide on that. This is a very convenient move for Poroshenko as it will allow him to move the March 2019 general election date. Poroshenko trails in the polls with some 8% of the total vote.

Russia called for a UN Security Council emergency meeting which will be held at today at 11:00am EST. The passage through the Kerch Strait is again open for civil vessels.

The usual anti-Russian subject in "western" political circles use the incident to demand more measures against Russia. Fronting the effort is the weapon industry lobbying group Atlantic Council:

Anders Åslund, a resident senior fellow in the Atlantic Council’s Eurasia Center, said: “NATO and the United States should send in naval ships in the Sea of Azov to guarantee that it stays open to international shipping.”

Such action, Åslund said, “would be in full compliance with the UN Law of the Sea Convention of 1982 and the Montreux Convention Regarding the Regime of the Straits of 1936.”

Anders Aslund is listed as member of the "U.S. & Canadian Cluster" of the secret influence operation by the British Foreign Office describe here two days ago. He is obviously unable to read a map, sea chart, or UN convention. The Ukrainian attempt to pass through the Kerch Strait without Russian consent is a breach of Article 7, 19 and 21 of the UN Law of the Sea Convention (pdf):

Article 7: "Subject to this Convention, ships of all States, whether coastal or land-locked, enjoy the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea."
...
Article 19-1: "Passage is innocent so long as it is not prejudicial to the peace, good order or security of the coastal State. Such passage shall take place in conformity with this Convention and with other rules of international law." 
...
Article 21-4: "Foreign ships exercising the right of innocent passage through the territorial sea shall comply with all such [coastal state] laws and regulations and all generally accepted international regulations relating to the prevention of collisions at sea."

There will now be again a lot of noise in the media about the 'nefarious Russians' and new demands for even more useless sanctions. But the legal case is clear. It was the Ukrainian navy that willfully attempted to pass from the Black Sea into the Sea of Azov through Russian territorial waters without regard to the laws and regulations of the coastal state. Russia was within its full rights to prevent the passage and to seize the Ukrainian boats.


***


Actualización:

En el sitio Sic Semper Tyrannys apareció esta nota relacionada con el evento posteado hoy. ¿Delirio? ¿Realidad? ¿Lo sabremos alguna vez? Acá va:



Título: Incident in the Kerch Strait

Texto: Earlier today Russian Navy, Coast Guard and Aerospace Forces intercepted and captured three Ukrainian vessels as they attempted to pass through the Kerch Strait en route to Mariupol. Russian authorities claim the Ukrainians failed to coordinate the passage and illegally entered Russian territorial waters. Ukraine claims their ships were illegally seized during a routine transit of the Strait. A detailed account of the incident, including a video of the deftly executed collision with the tugboat, can be read on the SouthFront site and many other sites by now.

These types of incidents occur from time to time. Remember the Navy patrol boats seized by the Iranians? They’re eventually resolved after much huffing and puffing and diplomatic activity. What strikes me about this incident is the lengths the Russians went to in stopping one Ukrainian tugboat and two small gunboats. The passage under the Kerch bridge was blocked by a large cargo ship. Two each Su-25 aircraft and Ka-52 attack helicopters flew overhead. The surface fleet consisted of several Sobol and Mangust class fast patrol craft, and a Svetlak class corvette. That tugboat was not going to pass through the Strait or get close to that new Crimean Bridge. Was there more to this than a mere provocation or coordination SNAFU? The following anonymous comment is from a SouthFront article. It may be just a conspiracy theory from a tinfoil hat wearing crazy. The commenter definitely has a flair for the dramatic. It may be disinformation. But what if there’s some truth in it? If so, holy crap!


Very important Info appeared briefly on Russian media (before being scrubbed) that a NATO SADM, possibly a Diver deployable device, was being transported by Ukrainian and British Special Forces to the Kerch Straight to be used on the Crimean bridge. The device was being tracked by the Russians and they knew it had been loaded on to a Ukrainian Tug (escorted by 5 warships!! - 3 in the Black Sea, including one NATO vessel, and 2 waiting in the Sea of Azov).

This is why the Russians acted!

They never react with force and have never blockaded the Sea of Azov. Ground attack jets and Helicopter gunships, plus a warship armed with ASM and Torpedos were waiting.

This level of force would not be used just for a tug and a few old Ukrainian ships. But a tug carrying a tactical nuclear device about to bring down one of the worlds most strategic bridges, a bridge hated by NATO - as per the recent Op Ed in the 'Washington Examiner' (Ukraine should bomb the Crimean Bridge).

Ukraine regularly provokes Russia to little effect, but today the Russians acted to stop a terrible event.

Ukraine is now in panic mode and there may be direct NATO intervention if the to cover this, if the Russians make this public.

The device may have come from the UK. 

The UK have been psychologically preparing their people for a war with Russia.

The SADM explosion would have brought down the bridge and melted the foundations, but looked like a conventional IED blast from above due to the underwater detonation and relatively low yield of less than 1KT.

This was a WW3 level provocation STOPPED by the Russian FSB and SF's!

All traces of these reports are being scrubbed as I write!

Get this out before the story is completely scrubbed.

I will not contact you again.  (SouthFront comments)



https://southfront.org/russia-ukraine-black-sea-military-crisis-on-the-brink-of-war/


https://southfront.org/poroshenko-regime-is-provoking-conflict-with-russia-in-waters-off-crimea/

4 comentarios:

  1. Sí te fijas las previas a reuniones cumbre desde que asumió Trump, siempre hubo provocaciones, sea a Rusia, sea a China, sea Siria.

    Se trata de un patrón claro, preciso y concordante con el objeto de hacer fracasar la política internacional de Trump para mejorar las relaciones con Rusia y China.

    Oti.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Fijarse que Trump no está avalando las barbaridades que sobre Rusia vomitó la representante de EE.UU. en el consejo de seguridad.

    No podía ser de otro modo puesto que Trump quiere avanzar en la cumbre del G20 en Argentina en el entendimiento con Rusia y China.

    ResponderEliminar
  3. Alguno podrá pensar "Ah manda a Nikki Haley a decir esas barbaridades para apretar y, luego, en las negociaciones sacarle algo a los rusos".

    Pero Trump no está en la lógica del juegod e suma 0, porque hay una complementariedad objetiva entre Rusia y EE.UU. e, incluso, entre China y EE.UU., la que puede favorecer económica y socialmente al pueblo estadounidense.

    No es cierto que los Estados Nacionales tienen intereses contrapuestos. Sí es cierto que las oligarquías que son el soporte de los Imperios tienen intereses contrapuestos a los Estados Nacionales.

    Los Estados Nacionales (es decir, si son soberanos) tienden a llegar a acuerdos con otros Estados Nacionales (si son soberanos). Y, es obvio, que esos acuerdos van a ser objeto de socavamiento por parte de las oligarquías.

    Cada vez que Trump quiso hacer cumbres con China y Rusia, la combinación entre la CIA y servicios británicos, el FBI, el Departamento de Justicia y las corporaciones mediáticas le quisieron hacer un desastre para impedir esos acuerdos.

    El boicot del día, antes de la cumbre del G 20 (donde está la expectativa de que Trump se reúna con Putin y el presidente chino), es la maniobra "de" Ucrania (pongo "de" entre comillas porque no es de Ucrania, es de las combinaciones señaladas precedentemente).

    Luego vendrá el informe del fiscal especial Mueller que va a apuntar a hacerle un juicio político al presidente Trump.

    ResponderEliminar
  4. Las presiones son tan enormes que Trump acaba de cancelar la reunión con Putin.

    Oti.

    ResponderEliminar