Una nota de Valentin
Katanasov para el sitio Strategic Culture Foundation pone varias cositas en perspectiva en relación con la impagable, incobrable deuda griega. Un telegrama para Juncker ahí!
Título: Tragic
History of XX Century and Crisis Faced by Greece
Texto: The whole
world is closely watching the situation unfolding in Greece. This country may
become a trigger to start a chain reaction leading to the collapse of united
Europe. A default on public debt (exceeding 320 billion euros) will be followed
by a default of Greek bonds holders. Nobody can make a forecast to predict the
economic and political consequences.
There is one more
aspect of the problem to take into account as it may entail long-term
ramifications. Greece put the issue of reparations into the fore. Before that
media reported that Germany owes Greece nine billion euros as a
compensation for the damage inflicted during the First World War.
It was widely
believed that all discussions related to reparations are a thing of the past as
70 years have passed since the hostilities ended and the only reason the war
could be remembered is to draw lessons from history. But Western creditors
drove Greece against the wall. For Athens the memories of the tragedy are still
vivid enough to make it put forward demands for financial indemnity. Witty
journalists called it the monetarization of history. Far-sighted experts
believe that Greece can set a bad example to be followed by those who face
financial woes. (1)
The idea of
putting forward demands for financial reparations is not new. The trials and
tribulations the Greek people went through during the war have never been
completely forgotten. Fascist Italy led by Mussolini tried to conquer Greece.
Then Nazi Germany invaded the country. Greece was occupied in 1941-1944. Crete
and the Aegean islands were under German yoke till the very end of WWII. The
occupation years were the time of hunger and cold. The country lost 250-400
thousand people. 40 thousand more were executed. 210 thousand Greeks were
transported to Germany to be subjected to forced labor. The country’s economy
was in ruins with houses and infrastructure destroyed. According to official
data, 1170 urban areas and 401 thousand buildings were destroyed, 906 ships
sunk and 129 bridges demolished. The country was plundered. Under the Germany’s
pressure the Bank of Greece had to grant a large credit that was never paid
off. Greece lost thousands of tons of precious metals taken from the country by
Nazis.
In 2012 the debt
was restructured and situation got better. Then the clouds gathered to make the
issue rise again. The government of New Democracy Party in coalition with PASOK
(the Panhellenic Socialist Movement) led by Antonis Samaras did not put forward
the demands for reparations to be paid by Germany. But the issue was in the
focus of discussions held by parliament and government to send a message to
Berlin. Back then the sum of reparations was mentioned for the first time.
According to estimations, the amount was 162 billion euros to include 108
billion euros as the reparations for the damage inflicted during the years of
occupation and 54 billion euros to repay the credit granted by the Bank of
Greece. According to Greek experts, the sums were much lower than the initial
assessments «discounted» by cautious politicians.
In January 2015
the Coalition of the Radical Left, mostly known by its acronym Syriza, came to
power and the demand for reparations hit the agenda once again to become a
burning issue. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras ordered the government to
prepare documents for filing lawsuits in international courts. The government
made its own calculations. In early April it said Germany owed Greece 279
billion euros, or 1, 7 times more than previously stated. The sum is equal to
88% of Greece’s sovereign debt. The redemption would make Greece the most
well-to-do country in eurozone and the European Union as a whole. Greece has an
axe to grind.
During the recent
two years Germany has been saying it had no intent to pay. According to German
government, the reparations have already been paid (115 million German marks).
Berlin believes there is no legal ground to claim reparations anymore.
The issue of WWII
reparations is very complicated. It was much easier after the First World War.
Back then the total amount was defined as well as the quotas for each country
to be compensated. There were mechanisms in place to collect, count and
distribute the money. It was different after the Second World War. The issue
was on the agenda of Yalta (February 1945) and Potsdam (July-August 1945)
conferences.
There was no
agreement reached on precise sums.The percentage of reparations which each
country was to receive was decided at an 18-nation conference held in Paris in
November and December, 1945. The conference established the Inter-Allied
Reparations Agency, composed of a representative of each of the nations, to
allocate German reparations payments. The reparations plan was based on the
assumption that Germany would have a unified economic system despite its
division into four zones of occupation. Unification, however, never occurred.
It made impossible to implement the decisions of Paris conference. The
emergence of two German states dotted the "i's" and crossed the
"t's". The issue was off the agenda since then.
The Treaty on the
Final Settlement With Respect to Germany (or the Two Plus Four Agreement) was
negotiated in 1990 between the Federal Republic of Germany and the German
Democratic Republic (the eponymous "Two"), and the Four Powers which
occupied Germany at the end of World War II in Europe: the Soviet Union,
France, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America. In the treaty the
Four Powers renounced all rights they held in Germany, allowing a united
Germany to become fully sovereign the following year. The issue of reparations
was not mentioned. That’s what Berlin uses as an argument.
There are many
legal and political nuances here to be studied by Greece and the Russian
Federation. Even according to Western estimates, the reparations received by
the USSR accounted for no more than 3-4% of real damage inflicted during the
war. The 2+4 agreement was necessary but it did not cover all the issues.
Only a
comprehensive multilateral treaty could finally solve all the problems related
to the Second World War. In a way, the Helsinki 1975 Act was a treaty
addressing these problems. But today its provisions are violated (especially
the clauses on inviolability of national borders) by the West. For instance, a
war was unleashed in Yugoslavia followed by the partition of the country. The
current Greek government says Greece was not part of the 2+4 treaty and the
document is not an obstacle on the way of putting forward claims for
reparations to be paid by Germany.
Athens remembers both world wars. After the First World War Germany was to pay off credits
and loans that had been granted to it before 1914. Besides, in 1919 the Paris
conference resulted in theTreaty of Versailles which had a provision setting
the stage for very high reparations Germany was supposed to pay. The West was
soft enough. It displayed «understanding» on many occasions and agreed to put
off payments and write off some of the debt. In 1933 Hitler came to power to
stop all payments. The «tolerant’ West had to put up with the fact. This
dubious policy continued after the Second World War. The last debt that had to
be paid in the XX century was finally redeemed only in 2010.
Today Athens
remembers the London 1953 Agreement on German External Debts, also known as the
London Debt Agreement, which actually was a debt relief treaty between the
Federal Republic of Germany and creditor nations. The London Debt Agreement
covered a number of different types of German debt from before and after the
Second World War. Some of them arose directly out of the efforts to finance the
reparations system, while others reflect extensive lending, mostly by U.S.
investors to German firms and governments. Under the London Debts Agreement of
1953, the repayable amount was reduced by 50% to about 15 billion marks and
stretched out over 30 years, and compared to the fast-growing German economy
were of minor impact. The Germany’s yearly debt burden after 1953 never
exceeded 5% of the income the country received from exports. (2)
Today experts
have no doubts there would have been no German economic miracle, if it were not
for the London 1953 agreement. Germany would be in the same plight as Greece.
Athens sends a message that Germany could be magnanimous enough to offer Greece
the conditions comparable to the ones offered to Germany in 1953.
Greek and the
experts of other countries realize that the Western creditors change their
policy on case to case basis. They tacitly pursue political aims. In the
1920s-1930s the Entente was tough on Germany to bring Hitler to power. Back
then they stuck to «the worse, the better» policy. The London 1953 agreement
was reached under the conditions of Cold War to create a counterbalance to the
Soviet Union in Europe.
Looks like some
circles under the certain are purposefully provoking the default of Greece to
shake Europe. But Greece remembers the First World War for other purposes than
making Germany recall its own history and be generous and reasonable. Athens
continues its offensive on the reparations front. Last week the Greek State
General Accounting Office came up with a report stating that Germany owes
Greece 9 billion euros in reparations from the First World War. The report
states that Greece was due to receive 0.4 percent of the total reparations due
to be paid after the First World War. Berlin was due to pay in 37 installments
but Greece only received 1.5 percent of the total (47 million marks according
to the prices of 1952) by the time the Lausanne Conference was held in the
summer of 1932, when Great Britain and France decided to suspend demands for
reparations payments from Germany (90%) due to the onset of the Great
Depression. However, Greece was not a signatory to the agreement so the claims
still stand and are now the equivalent of 9 billion euros, the report stated.
The decisions were taken by «great powers» to pave the way for Hitler (the
would-be messiah) rising to the top. (3) Nobody took into account the opinion
of small countries like Greece.
Today Greece does
its best to avoid default. The issue of reparations for the damage inflicted in
the First and Second World Wars is very problematic. But the possibility exists
that the sovereign debt may be restructured taking into account the reparation
demands. Berlin is ready for a fierce fight. It is afraid of setting a
precedent to be used by other states, including Russia.
At all events,
the reparation initiatives launched by Athens are not useless. They make
remember the tragic events of the XX century and the lessons to be drawn.
Notas:
(1) V. Katasonov.
Russia in the World of Reparations. Kislorod publishing house, 2015.
(2) Jürgen Kaiser.
One Made it Out of the Debt Trap. Lessons from the London Debt Agreement of
1953 for Current Debt Crises, 2013.
(3) V. Katasonov.
Genoa Conference in the context of World and Russian History. Kislorod
publishing house, 2015.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario