miércoles, 7 de diciembre de 2016

Europa, combatiendo al capital


Vieron cómo es esto: están los ladrones de gallinas y luego están los banqueros. Los primeros generalmente van presos; a los segundos los rescata el estado (dónde se vio que tipos con corbata y trajes de 3.000 euros tengan que rendirle cuentas a alguien?). El tercer banco italiano, el Monte Paschi, anda con problemitas. Los chicos apostaron por derivados, esos "instrumentos" de la "ingeniería financiera" de los magos del universo de las finanzas. Pagadió, por supuesto. 

El Monte Paschi no deja de tener cierto valor simbólico sobre los tiempos que corren. Leemos en Wikipedia: Banca Monte dei Paschi di Siena S.p.A. (MPS) es el banco en funcionamiento más antiguo del mundo. Fundado en 1472 por la Magistratura de la ciudad de Siena, Italia, como un monte de piedad, ha estado en servicio ininterrumpidamente desde entonces. En la actualidad consiste aproximadamente en 3000 oficinas, 33.000 empleados y 4,5 millones de clientes en Italia, así como en sus filiales y negocios en el extranjero.

Revisemos primero algunos títulos recientes del diario español El País cuando ponemos "Monte Paschi" en su motor interno de búsqueda: 


07/02/2013
El banco Monte Paschi di Siena reconoce 730 millones en pérdidas por derivados
El consejo ha reconocido la existencia de "ciertos errores en el tratamiento contable de tres transacciones estructuradas"

07/03/2013
Hallan muerto al portavoz del Monte Paschi en plena investigación del banco
La entidad ocultó pérdidas millonarias y su antigua cúpula afronta acusaciones de fraude y de dar información falsa

16/04/2013
Italia retiene 1.800 millones a Nomura por el escándalo en Monte Paschi
La cifra incluye 88 millones en comisiones no declaradas. La fiscalía investiga al exconsejero delegado del banco japonés

14/11/2014
Bancos ‘en corto’
El supervisor bursátil de Italia ha prohibido las apuestas bajistas en Monte Paschi Siena y Carige

05/07/2016
El banco Monte dei Paschi di Siena se deprecia un 30% en dos días en Bolsa
La entidad toca su mínimo en plena negociación sobre su posible rescate

25/10/2016
El banco Monte dei Paschi recortará 2.600 empleos y cerrará 500 oficinas
La entidad italiana perdió entre enero y septiembre 848,7 millones de euros


***

Esta mañana nos desayunamos con la siguiente noticia noticia relativa al Banco Monte Paschi en el sitio web Zero Hedge:


Título: Italian Government Prepares To Nationalize Monte Paschi

Texto: The wait is almost over. After two previous taxpayer funded bailouts, and nearly five months of foreplay since the third largest Italian bank failed the latest European stress test at the end of July, in which the Italian government in September vow that "bailout for Italian banks has been 'absolutely' ruled out", a third bailout, as we previewed earlier today, is now imminent.

According to Reuters, which cites two sources, Italy is preparing to take a €2 billion controlling stake in Monte Paschi as the bank's hopes of a private funding rescue have faded after a fruitless five month search to secure an anchor investor, following Prime Minister Matteo Renzi's decision to quit.

The government, which is already the ailing bank's single largest shareholder with a four percent share, is planning do a debt-for-equity swap, and buy junior bonds held by ordinary Italians to take the stake up to 40%, the sources said. The bonds would then be equitized, converting the government's bond stake into pure equity ownership, a troubling approach as it would effectively wipe out the existing equity tranche and position the bank for a potential bankruptcy fight in court where the government faces off with the equity committee.

This transaction would make the government by far the biggest shareholder, meaning the Treasury would be able to control Italy's third biggest bank and its shareholder meetings, or in other words, the bank would be nationalized.

The sources said a government decree authorizing the deal, which would see the state buy the subordinated bonds from retail investors and convert them into shares, could be rushed through as early as this weekend. Italy's treasury would buy the bonds held by around 40,000 retail investors at face value, the sources said.

It is unclear how the senior bondholders, who would not be made whole would feel about a government transaction which favors the juniors (who would get par) where the bulk of the retail investors are found, would feel about such a transaction which would bring memories of the US government's "bailout" of GM which flipped the bankruptcy process on its head by prioritizing junior pensioners over senior creditors.

That way the transaction is structure, the government would ensure retail investors do not suffer any losses in the bank's bailout, making it politically more palatable and staving off the risk of a run on deposits that could trigger a wider banking crisis.

The bank, which needs to raise €5 billion by the end of December or risk winding down, is set to raise 1 billion euros from a bond swap with institutional investors and Rome is hoping the 2 billion euros participation from the government could help persuade private investors to fill the 2 billion euros gap. Since any new equity investors would come in as the equivalent of post-petition equity, it would mean that existing equityholders, already a token amount, would be wiped out.

"It's a de-facto nationalization with a strong presence by the state that can attract other investors and allow the transaction to be completed," said one of the sources, speaking on condition of anonymity.

There is another problem: in the past both Merkel and Schauble, not to mention Djisselbloem, have made it expressly clear that a bail-in mechanism should be used to preserve insolvent banks, and a state-funded and taxpayer backed bailout/nationalization is no longer permitted. Allowing Italy to proceed with this transaction would make a mockery of Europe's entire "bail-in" protocol, not to mention the European finance ministers' resolve and ability to implement anything, which is why the European Commission would need to assess whether the government's intervention is taking place at market prices or if it constitutes state aid, another source said.

However, since an Italian contagion wave would inevitably slam Deutsche Bank and Germany's various other banks, Europe will find the deal to be "whatever it needs it to be, to make it possible.

Monte dei Paschi, rated the weakest lender in European stress tests this summer, had planned to arrange a private rescue, starting with a firm commitment from one or more anchor investors and then launching a share sale this week.

There is still some hope for a private rescue without a government intervention, but that is evaporating by the hour.  According to Reuters, the chances of the privately backed deal going ahead as planned were now slim. A source close to Qatar's cash-rich sovereign wealth fund said it could inject €1.4 billion in the bank but wanted to wait to see what kind of government would succeed Renzi. Other sources were more cautious on Qatar's willingness to back the deal.

Monte Paschi's bank's chief executive, Marco Morelli, held talks with European Central Bank officials in Frankfurt on Tuesday to review its options. A meeting of the bank's board is likely to take place on Wednesday. At that point it is likely to greenlight the first major European bank bailout in a year in which the G-20 leader previously declared that the global economy is fixed and is now reflating itself back to growth.

2 comentarios:

  1. No se trata de problemas individuales de una u otra institución bancaria y financiera. Se trata de un problema sistémico de largo plazo que está llegando a los bordes del límite.

    A las instituciones más grandes y más importantes del mundo (por lo general angloamericanas) les pasa lo mismo, lo que pasa es que tienen más poder para sesgar el sistema a su favor y evitar la quiebra, lo que no quiere decir que no estén realmente quebradas.

    El sistema económico occidental no funciona (estancamiento, recesión, austeridad, ajuste, etc.) porque no tiene crédito real dirigido a las actividades productivas, en gran medida a causa de esta crisis de desintegración financiera.

    La "flexibilización cuantitativa" en USA y los rescates financieros no se convierten en crédito real a la economía real. Son billones de U$S que se "inutilizan" en administrar la crisis financiera.

    Por eso está en el tapete la propuesta de reinstaurar la Glass Steagall que introdujo FDR en 1933 (separación de banca comercial de la de inversión). Si esto se hiciera las políticas de rescate financiero no serían legales y se tendría que diseñar un sistema de crédito real para la economía real y no U$S financieros para tapar quiebra financiera.

    ResponderEliminar
  2. Esa vieja costumbre de morirse "suicidados" que tienen los banqueros italianos (a lo Calvi)

    ResponderEliminar