Parece que se
vienen más días interesantes, tanto para Rusia (en torno a la situación en Ucrania) como en el corazón del Imperio (Trump y su eterna batalla contra el estado profundo). La nota que
sigue es de el comentarista ruso apodado “The Saker” y salió publicada en
UnzReview:
Título:
Interesting week for Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump
Texto:
Putin’s latest
move
I don’t follow
the western corporate media so I don’t really know how much coverage this
development has received in the West, but in Russia and the Ukraine the big
news is the decision by Russia to begin recognizing official Novorussian
documents such as passports, driver licenses, school and college diplomas, etc.
The Russians were pretty specific in the way the made the announcement. They
said that it was a temporary measure dictated by humanitarian considerations.
They have a point. Until now, the residents of the Donetsk and Lugansk People’s
Republics had to travel to the Nazi-occupied Ukraine to try to get their
documents. Which, considering how the Ukronazis consider anybody from the
Donbass was not only futile, but sometimes dangerous. This decision makes
perfect sense practically. But, of course, it has a far-reaching symbolic
dimension too. The timing is also crucial: by recognizing the documents issued
by the DNR and LNR authorities, the Russians have de facto “semi-recognized”
the authorities which issued them and that is just a fairly short step away
from recognizing these republics.
Right now, the
Kremlin is vehemently denying any such thoughts. But all the Kremlin-affiliated
commentators are rather blunt about what this really means. According to them,
the message for the junta in Kiev is simple: if you attack Novorussia or if you
officially ditch the Minks agreements we will immediately recognize these two
republics. And, once that happens, it’s over the the Ukronazis, these republics
will be gone just like South Ossetia or Abkhazia. Of course, nobody will
officially recognize the independence of these republics, but neither will
anybody do anything meaningful about it. And, let’s be honest, the Russian authorities
couldn’t care less about what western politicians or their corporate media have
to say: they already heard it all and it’s not like they could be demonized
much further.
The next logical
move would be to move the Russian border control from the Russian border to the
line of contact. Or not. If the Russians don’t do it, this might be a sign that
they support the official position of the Republics which is that they want to
liberate the totality of the Doentsk and Lugansk regions. By the way, the
Russian Border Guards are elite and highly militarized forces whose presence on
the line of contact would in no way prevent a Novorussian (counter-)attack
against the Ukronazi forces. So the decision about where to deploy them would
have a primarily political dimension and no real military consequences.
Right now the
Ukronazis have basically gone officially on record in declaring that they never
intended to abide by the terms of the Minsk 1 and Minsk 2 agreements. Here is
what Anton Gerashchenko, an special adviser to the Minister of internal Affairs
of Ukraine and a member of the Board of the Ministry of internal Affairs of
Ukraine openly declared on Ukrainian national TV: (emphasis added).
Let’s immediately
say that the Minsk Agreements were not implemented from the day they were
signed in February 2015. This was a temporary measure on the side of the
Ukraine and, I will be honest, a deliberate deception. Remember that the first
Minsk Agreement was signed following the military disaster near Ialovaisk when
we had no forces to defend the front from Donetsk to Mariupol. The second Minsk
Agreement was signed following the treacherous Russian aggression on Debaltsevo
and the formation of the “Debaltsevo Cauldron”. These agreements are not
international agreements or anything else.
Needless to say,
NOBODY in the West paid any attention to this statement, and why would they,
after all, their line has always been that Russia is not abiding by the Minsk
Agreement, even if Russia is not even a party to them (Russia is only a witness
and guarantor). And if a senior Ukronazi official says otherwise, who cares?!
This amazing
admission by Gerashchenko is only the latest in a series of steps taken and
statements made by various Ukronazis to the effect that “we are done
negotiating and from now on, we will solve this problem by force”. So far, the
“force” applied has been primarily in the form of a total blockade of the
Donbass which included the prevention of a large amount of vitally needed coal
to the Nazi-occupied Ukraine from the Donbass even though this shipment had
already been paid for. Officially Poroshenko does not condone this blockade,
but in practice he is either unwilling or unable to prevent or stop it. Another
sign that the Independent Banderastan is falling apart.
There is a strong
feeling in Russia that Poroshenko is powerless and that the Ukronazi crazies
are up to no good. Clearly, *nobody* in the Ukronazis elites has any intention
of actually implementing the Minsk 1 and Minsk 2 agreements. That, by the way,
might be a dangerous approach for a number of reasons:
First, these
agreements were endorsed by the UNSC and every country out there, at least as
far as I know. So Gerashchenko is wrong – the Minsk Agreements are binding
under international law.
Second, the
Ukrainian authorities recently found and released a document showing that
Yanukovich had made an official request for a Russian intervention in the
Ukraine. They wanted to show that he was a traitor. But in the process, they
also showed that the last legitimate president of the Ukraine had made a legal
request for a Russian intervention which might well mean that, at least in
legal terms, any subsequent Russian intervention in the Ukraine would be 100%
legal.
Even better,
Yanukovich is still in Russia. And, from a legal point of view, you could make
the case that he is still the legitimate president of the Ukraine. If the
Yemeni President in exile Abdrabbuh Mansour Hadi could ask the Saudis to
intervene in Yemen, why would that no be an option for Poroshenko Yanukovich to
ask for such an intervention in the Ukraine?
Right now, the
Russians are making no such legalistic statements. But you can be sure that
they have already aligned all their ducks in a neat row just in case they do
decide to openly intervene in this civil war.
How realistic is
the possibility of a Russian recognition of the breakaway republics or an overt
Russian intervention in the Ukraine?
I think that it
all depends on what the Ukronazis crazies do. If they really attack Novorussia
I expect the Kremlin to recognize the DNR and LRN. A Russian intervention? I
doubt it, but only because I believe that the DNR/LNR can handle a Nazi attack.
So the only question for me is how long Poroshenko will stay in power and what
the real crazies will do once they overthrow him. Right now this mostly depends
on the USA but since the US elites are locked in desperate struggle for power,
I don’t see the Trump taking and dramatic decisions anyway, not in the Ukraine,
not elsewhere. At least not as long as there is a question mark as to who is
really in charge in the White House. Everybody is waiting for the outcome of
that struggle, including Moscow and Kiev.
Trump – all
words, no action, but good words
In the meantime,
Trump has been busy doing speeches. Which sounds pretty bad until you realize
that these are good speeches, very good ones even. For one thing, he still is
holding very firmly to the line that the “fake news” (which in “Trumpese” means
CNN & Co. + BBC) are the enemies of the people. The other good thing that
twice in a row now he has addressed himself directly to the people. Sounds like
nothing, but I think that this is huge because the Neocons have now nicely
boxed Trump in with advisors and aides which span from mediocre, to bad to
outright evil. The firing of Flynn was a self-defeating disaster for Trump who
now is more or less alone, with only one loyal ally left, Bannon. I am not sure
how much Bannon can do or, for that matter, how long until the Neocons get to
him too, but besides Bannon I see nobody loyal to Trump and his campaign
promises. Nobody except those who put him in power of course, the millions of
Americans who voted for him. And that is why Trump is doing the right thing
speaking directly to them: they might well turn out to be his biggest weapon
against the “DC swamp”.
Furthermore, by
beating on the media, especially CNN and the rest of the main US TV channels,
Trump is pushing the US public to turn to other information sources, including
those sympathetic to him, primarily on the Internet. Good move – that is how he
won the first time around and that is how he might win again.
The Neocons and
the US ‘deep state’ have to carefully weigh the risks of continuing their
vendetta against Trump. Right now, they appear to be preparing to go after
Bannon. But what will they do if Trump, instead of ditching Bannon like he
ditched Flynn, decides to dig in and fight with everything he has got? Then
what? If there is one thing the Neocons and the deep state hate is to have a
powerful light pointed directly at them. They like to play in the dark, away
from an always potentially hostile public eye. If Trump decides to fight back,
really fight back, and if he appeals directly to the people for support, there
is no saying what could happen next.
I strongly
believe that the American general public is deeply frustrated and angry.
Obama’s betrayal of all his campaign promises only made these feelings worse.
But when Obama had just made it to the White House I remember thinking that if
he really tried to take on the War Machine and if he came to the conclusion
that the ‘deep state’ was not going to let him take action or threaten him he
could simply make a public appeal for help and that millions of Americans would
flood the streets of Washington DC in support of “their guy” against the
“bastards in DC”. Obama was a fake. But Trump might not be. What if the Three
Letter Agencies or Congress suddenly tried to, say, impeach Trump and what if
he decided ask for the support of the people – would millions not flood the
streets of DC? I bet you that Florida alone would send more than a million.
Ditto for Texas. And I don’t exactly imagine the cops going out of their way to
stop them. The bottom line is this: in any confrontation between Congress and
Trump most of the people will back Trump. And, if it ever came to that, and for
whatever it is worth, in any confrontation between Trump-haters and
Trump-supporters the latter will easily defeat the former. The “basket of
deplorables” are still, thank God, the majority in this country and they have a
lot more power than the various minorities who backed the Clinton gang.
There are other,
less dramatic but even more likely scenarios to consider. Say Congress tries to
impeach Trump and he appeals to the people and declares that the “DC swamp” is
trying to sabotage the outcome of the elections and impose its will upon the
American people. Governors in states like Florida or Texas, pushed by their
public opinion, might simply decide not to recognize the legitimacy of what
would be an attempted coup by Congress against the Executive branch of
government. Now you tell me – does Congress really have the means to impose
it’s will against states like Florida or Texas? I don’t mean legally, I mean
practically. Let me put it this way: if the states revolt against the federal
government does the latter have the means to impose its authority? Are the
creation of USNORTHCOM and the statutory exceptions from the Posse Comitatus
Act (which makes it possible to use the National Guard to suppress
insurrections, unlawful obstructions, assemblages, or rebellions) sufficient to
guarantee that the “DC swamp” can impose its will on the rest of the country? I
would remind any “DC swamp” members reading these lines that the KGB special
forces refused not once, but twice, to open fire against the demonstrators in
Moscow (in 1991 and 1993) even though they had received a direct order by the
President to do just that. Is there any reason to believe that US cops and
soldiers would be more willing than the KGB special forces to massacre their
own people?
Donald Trump has
probably lost most of his power in Washington DC, but that does not entail that
this is the case in the rest of the USA. The Neocons can feel like the big guy
on the block inside the Beltway, but beyond that they are mostly in “enemy
territory” controlled by the “deplorables”, something to keep in mind before
triggering a major crisis.
This week I got
the feeling that Trump was reaching out and directly seeking for the support to
the American people. I think he get it if needed. If this is so, then the focus
of his Presidency will be less on foreign affairs, were the USA will be mostly
paralyzed, than on internal US politics were he still might make a difference.
On Russia the Neocons have basically beat Trump – he won’t have the means to
engage in any big negotiating with Vladimir Putin. But, at least, neither will
he constantly be trying to make things worse. The more the US elites fight each
other, the less venom they will have left for the rest of mankind. Thank God
for small favors…
I can only hope
that Trump will continue to appeal directly the people and try to bypass the
immense machine which is currently trying to isolate him. Of course, I would
much prefer that Trump take some strong and meaningful action against the deep
state, but I am not holding my breath.
Tonight I spoke
with a friend who knows a great deal more about Trump than I do and he told me
that I have been too quick in judging Trump and that while the Flynn episode
was definitely a setback, the struggle is far from over and that we are in for
a very long war. I hope that my friend is right, but I will only breathe a sigh
of relief if and when I see Trump hitting back and hitting hard. Only time will
tell.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario