¿Quién está
realmente detrás del presidente estadounidense Donald Trump? ¿Qué tipo de fuerzas, poderes, organismos, grupos de poder, think tanks, en fin, lo que suele rodear a alguien
con pretensiones políticas en el corazón del Imperio? Como nunca nos creímos el cuento del millonario aburrido que decide entrar a la política, nos pica la curiosidad. Bien, al respecto, leímos una interesante nota del analista William Engdahl aparecida recientemente en su sitio web
(http://www.williamengdahl.com). A ver si les gusta:
Título: Is Trump
the Back Door Man for Henry A. Kissinger & Co?
Epígrafe: The
term Back Door Man has several connotations. In the original blues song written
by Willie Dixon, it refers to a man having an affair with a married woman,
using the back door to flee before the husband comes home. During the Gerald
Ford Presidency, Back Door Man was applied to Dick Cheney as Ford’s White House
Chief of Staff and his “skills” at getting what he wanted through opaque means.
More and more as Cabinet choices are named, it looks like the entire Trump
Presidency project is emerging as Henry A. Kissinger’s “Back Door Man,” in the
Cheney meaning of the term.
Texto: Long
forgotten is Trump’s campaign rhetoric about draining the swamp. In October
during his campaign candidate Trump issued a press release stating, “Decades of
special interest dealing must come to an end. We have to break the cycle of
corruption…It is time to drain the swamp in Washington, D.C…That is why I am
proposing a package of ethics reforms to make our government honest once again.
”
So far, the
President-elect has already named more billionaires to cabinet and other top posts
than any other president in US history–Betsy DeVos of the AmWay fortune as
Education Secretary, Wilbur Ross as Commerce Secretary, Linda McMahon as Small
Business Administrator, and Vincent Viola, as Army Secretary. That’s not
including Trump himself as a putative billionaire.
Then in terms of
the vested special interests of Wall Street, Goldman Sachs has a huge power in
the new Administration. Goldman Sachs partner Steven Mnuchin is Trump’s nominee
for US Treasury Secretary. Goldman Sachs President Gary Cohn will be his top
White House Economic Adviser. Anthony Scaramucci, Presidential Transition Team
Executive Committee member, is a former Goldman Sachs banker as well as Steve
Bannon, Trump’s chief strategist and Senior Counselor.
We add to that
assemblage no fewer than four US military generals representing the most
corrupt military industrial complex in world history: as Secretary of Defense
retired General James “Mad Dog” Mattis, Board member since retiring of major
defense contractor General Dynamics; retired Lt. General Mike Flynn, with his
own consulting firm, as his National Security Adviser and retired General John
F. Kelly as Secretary of Homeland Security.
Add to this
collection the naming of Rex Tillerson the CEO of ExxonMobil, the largest oil
multinational of the United States, as Secretary of State; the ex-Governor of
Texas, America’s largest oil producing state, Rick Perry, as Secretary of
Energy, along with pro-shale energy Oklahoma Attorney General, Scott Pruitt to
be head of the Environmental Protection Agency, and certain dramatic economic
policy flips begin to emerge compared with the previous hapless Presidency.
Back Door for
Kissinger Geopolitics
What emerges is
not pretty and, sadly, more than confirms my earlier piece on the Trump
Deception.
However, all this
misses in my view one essential component, namely the shadowy role of former
Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger, who is emerging as the unofficial and
key foreign policy adviser of the Trump Administration. If we follow
Kissinger’s tracks in recent months we find a highly interesting series of
meetings.
On December 26,
2016 the German daily Bild Zeitung published what it said was a copy of an
analysis by members of the Trump Transition Team which revealed that as
President Trump will seek “constructive cooperation” with the Kremlin, a
dramatic contrast to Obama confrontation and sanctions policies. The newspaper
went on to discuss the role of 93-year-old former Secretary of State, Henry A.
Kissinger as Trump’s leading, if unofficial, foreign policy adviser. The report
stated that Kissinger is drafting a plan to bring Putin’s Russia and Trump’s
Washington to more “harmonious” relations that includes US official recognition
of Crimea as part of Russia and lifting of US economic sanctions that Obama
imposed in retribution for the Crimea annexation in 2014, among other steps.
The kicker in
this otherwise sensible-sounding US policy change is Kissinger’s sly
geopolitical aim in “gettin’ Putin back in the (NATO) tent,” as late Texan
President Lyndon Baines Johnson might have elegantly put it.
What is the aim
of Kissinger? Not any “multi-polar world” that respects national sovereignty as
he claims, of that you can be certain. Kissinger’s aim is to subtly erode the
growing bilateral axis between China and Russia that threatens US global
hegemony.
The trend of the
last several years since Obama’s ill-fated coup d’etat in Ukraine in early
2014, threatened to jeopardize Kissinger’s lifetime project, otherwise called
David Rockefeller’s “march towards a World Government,” a World Government in
which “supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past
centuries ,” to use Rockefeller’s words to one of his select groups during the
collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. The Bild Zeitung Trump-Kissinger memo
states that the idea of warming up to Russia is aimed at offsetting China’s
military buildup2. In other words, a different game from Obama’s, but a game of
power nonetheless.
Real Balance of
Power
Kissinger is one
of the few surviving practitioners of historical British Balance of Power
geopolitics. True British Balance of Power, as practiced in British military
and diplomatic history since the Treaty of Windsor of 1386, between England and
Portugal, always involved Britain making an alliance with the weaker of two
rivals to defeat the stronger and in the process, to afterwards loot the
exhausted weaker power as well. It was extraordinarily successful in building
the British Empire down to World War II.
British Balance
of Power is always about what power, in this case a Kissinger-steered United
States, does the “balancing.” Following the defeat of Napoleon’s France at the
Congress of Vienna peace talks in 1814, British Foreign Secretary, Viscount
Castlereagh, architected a treaty that insured no Continental European power
could dominate over the others, a strategy that lasted until 1914 and the First
World War. What many political historians ignore is that that Continental
Balance of Power was essential for creation of the British Empire that
dominated the world as the leading naval power for a century.
In his 1950’s
Harvard University PhD dissertation, Kissinger wrote what became a book titled,
“A World Restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the Problems of Peace,
1812-1822.” That study of British Balance of Power is at the heart of
Kissinger’s Machiavellian machinations ever since he took his first job with
the Rockefeller family in the 1960’s. In A World Restored Kissinger states,
“Diplomacy cannot be divorced from the realities of force and power. But
diplomacy should be divorced…from a moralistic and meddlesome concern with the
internal policies of other nations.” Further, he states, “The ultimate test of
a statesman, then, is his ability to recognize the real relationship of forces
and to make this knowledge serve his ends .”
Since his
relationship began in the 1950’s with Nelson Rockefeller and the brothers Rockefeller–Laurance,
David, Winthrop– Henry Kissinger has been the core strategist of the
Rockefeller family’s globalization or World Government above nation states as
David called it in 1991. That included Kissinger’s role with the Bilderberg
Meetings, with David’s Trilateral Commission and right down to the present. It
was Secretary of State Kissinger who asked his good friend David Rockefeller to
facilitate Nixon’s “China opening” to the West in 1971. Then the geopolitical
aim of Kissinger’s rebalance was to seduce China, then the weaker of
Washington’s two great adversaries, into the Western alliance against the
Soviet Union, then the stronger adversary, at least in military and
geopolitical terms.
Today, as the
year 2017 begins, the roles have turned and clearly China has emerged after
more than three decades of unbridled industrial and economic expansion, as the
stronger challenger of David Rockefeller’s so-called World Government. Russia,
following the economic savagery and deindustrialization of the post-1991
Yeltsin years, is in Kissinger’s view, clearly the weaker of his two
adversaries. Both China and Russia under Xi Jinping and Putin, are, together
with Iran, the most formidable defenders of national sovereignty–the main
obstacles standing in the way of David Rockefeller’s (I use him as the
template) World (fascist) Government.
Kissinger’s
strange diplomacy
If we perceive
Kissinger’s recent actions from this perspective–how to break the emerging
Eurasian threat to a Western-dominated One World Order–it makes much sense. He
has been shockingly fulsome in his recent praise of the political neophyte
casino mogul Trump. In an early December CBS TV interview, Kissinger said that
Trump, “has the possibility of going down in history as a very considerable
President.” He added that because of perceptions that Obama weakened America’s
influence abroad, “one could imagine that something remarkable and new emerges”
out of a Trump administration. “I’m saying it’s an extraordinary opportunity .”
The more we look
under the rocks and at the key foreign policy choices of neophyte Trump, we
find the pawprints of Henry A. Kissinger. The choice of General James “Mad Dog”
Mattis to be Secretary of Defense intersects Kissinger. Mattis and Kissinger
both served until early 2016 on the Board of Directors of a bizarre and very
controversial California medical technology private partnership, Theranos,
together with (until recently) former US Secretary of State George Shultz,
former Secretary of Defense Bill Perry, retired U.S. Navy Adm. Gary Roughead,
former Wells Fargo Bank chairman Dick Kovacevich.
Mattis, whom
Trump compares to General Patton, in August, 2016 wrote a report attacking both
Obama, Bush and Bill Clinton administrations’ foreign military policy, blasting
the last three administrations for a perceived lack of national security
vision, by ignoring threats posed by Russia, China and terrorist groups
worldwide.
As well, the
pawprints of the sly Kissinger appear with the surprise naming of ExxonMobil head
Rex Tillerson to be Secretary of State. ExxonMobil is of course the original
core of the Rockefeller family wealth. Kissinger issued a decisive and strong
recommendation of Tillerson, stating that because Tillerson has strong personal
relations with Russian President Putin and Russian state oil company, Rosneft,
it is no reason to disqualify Tillerson: “I pay no attention to the argument
that he is too friendly to Russia. As head of Exxon it’s his job to get along
with Russia. He would be useless as the head of Exxon if he did not have a
working relationship with Russia .” As with Kissinger and Mattis, Kissinger
also serves on a Board of Trustees with Tillerson. Both Tillerson and Kissinger
are Trustees of the very influential Washington Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS), along with such as Zbigniew Brzezinski and former
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.
In true Kissinger
secret diplomacy style so skillfully applied during his role in triggering the
October, 1973 Yom Kippur war, Kissinger has apparently won the respect of
Vladimir Putin as a “world class politician.” In February, 2016 Kissinger went
to Moscow to privately meet with Putin.1 Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called
that meeting a continuation of “a friendly dialogue between President Putin and
Henry Kissinger, who are bound by a long-standing relationship .”
And on December
2, Kissinger was personally invited by China President Xi Jinping to meet in
Beijing to discuss the prospects for China of the Trump presidency. Kissinger
is regarded since 1971 as uniquely trusted by the Chinese to serve as a
mediator of US policy intentions .
With Kissinger
now in a unique relationship with President-elect Trump as shadow foreign
policy adviser, with Kissinger allies Tillerson as Secretary of State and
Mattis as Secretary of Defense, it is beginning to appear that the heavy hand
of Kissinger and his version of British Balance of Power political
manipulations is about to target China, as well as Iran, and to try to use
Putin and Russia to destroy the genuine possibility of a counterweight to
Western One World delusions, by fostering mistrust and bad blood between China
and Russia and Iran.
There is simply
too much coincidence in the recent emergence of the Kissinger–world statesman
of peace–to not think that in truth, from the outset, Donald Trump was designed
to be Henry A. Kissinger’s Back Door Man, in order to re-tilt global
geopolitics back to a US leading role as Domina über Alles.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario