El sitio web South Front reproduce esta interesante nota de Vladimir Prav. Lo que sospechábamos: hay teoría detrás de cada tropelía del Imperio. A ver si te gusta:
Título:
Controlled chaos: How the U.S. empire infects other nations in its pursuit for
total control
Epígrafe:
Professor Prav succinctly sums up the illegal, neo-colonial enterprise
currently being pursued by the United States, and identifies the main means by
which they are doing so. A more appropriate moniker for the phenomenon,
however, was provided by Dr. Andrew Lobaczewski and fully described in his
book, Political Ponerology. It is called "artificially infected
pathocracy." The strategy of controlled chaos isn't fully comprehensible
without grasping the psychopathology of the individuals who implement it.
Texto: Nowadays,
a variety of means are being used in order to implement and extend the
"controlled chaos" in the national economies and societies in the
geopolitical struggle. The actor, who is using the tool, is maintaining the
"controlled chaos" within the opposing country.
Steven Mann, the
US foreign policy expert who took part in the developing of many of the current
"controlled chaos" hotspots in various parts of the world, speaks
openly of the need to use "increased level strongly-worded
criticism", and causing "controlled chaos" to secure and promote
the US national interests.
Steven Mann is a
key figure behind the development of the "controlled chaos" theory as
a means of furthering US national interests. Mann was born in 1951 and
graduated from Oberlin College in 1973 with a B.A. in German. In 1974 he
obtained an M.A. in German Literature from the Cornell University and has been
a member of the Foreign Service since 1976. He received a Harriman Institute
for Advanced Soviet Studies scholarship to obtain an M.A. in Political Science
from the Columbia University in 1985-1986. He graduated from the National
Defense University in Washington, D.C.
He began his
career as a US embassy staffer in Jamaica. Later he worked in Moscow, at the
USSR desk in the State Department, and at the State Department Operations
Center (a 24-hour crisis center). He served as the acting chief of mission in
Micronesia (1986-1988), Mongolia (1988), and Armenia (1992). Between 1991 and
1992 he worked at the US Department of Defense dealing with Russia and Eastern
Europe, and in 1992-1994 he was assigned to Sri Lanka as deputy ambassador.
Between 1995 and 1998, he was employed as the head of the India, Nepal, and Sri
Lanka desk at the State Department. Since 2001, Mann has been a presidential
special representative to the Caspian Sea countries acting as the main spokesman
for US energy interests in that region and a lobbyist for the
Aktau-Baku-Tbilisi-Jeikhan oil pipeline.
Upon graduating
from the NDU in 1992, Mann wrote an article titled Chaos Theory and Strategic
Thought // Parameters (US Army War College Quarterly, Vol. XXII, Autumn 1992,
pp. 54-68). In this article, he lays out the following theses: "We can
learn a lot if we view chaos and reorganization as opportunities, and not
pursue stability as an illusory goal..." "The international
environment is an excellent example of a chaotic system, with
"self-organizing criticality" being a useful analytical tool. The
world is doomed to be chaotic, because the many human actors in politics have
different objectives and values." "Each actor in politically critical
systems creates conflict energy, ...which provokes a change in status quo thus
participating in creating a critical situation...and any course of action
brings the state of affairs into an unavoidable cataclysmic
reorganization."
The main thought
which flows from Mann's thoughts is to bring the system into a state of
"political criticality." Then the system, given certain conditions,
will unavoidably enter chaos and "transformation." Mann also writes
that "Given the US advantage in communications and growing global mobility
capabilities, the virus (in the sense of an ideological infection) will be
self-replicating and will expand chaotically. Therefore our national security
will be preserved." And further: "This is the only way to establish a
long-term world order. If we cannot accomplish such an ideological change in
the whole world, we will have only sporadic periods of calm between
catastrophic transformations." Mann's words about "world order"
are there for the sake of political correctness. Because his article speaks
only of chaos which, judging by Mann's words, will be the "best guarantee
of US national security," with only the US able to preserve itself as an
"island of order" in an ocean of "controlled criticality"
or global chaos.
According to the
"theory", dismantling of the already existing nation-states,
traditional cultures, and civilizations can be accomplished by:
- De-ideologizing
the population
- Dumping the
"ballast" of the already existing values, and replacing them with
one's own set
- Increasing
material expectations, especially among the elite
- Loss of control
over the economy and its ultimate destruction
- Unlawful
actions by supposedly spontaneous movements which often have ethnic or
religious carácter
Once implemented,
these key policies lead to "color revolutions."
"Controlled
chaos" theory is based on reforming the mass consciousness, worldviews,
and the spiritual sphere by subjecting individuals to modern means of
manipulation. It amounts to a global psychological operation that is part of
globalization and which destroys the culture of solidarity and replaces it with
a cult of money and of Social-Darwinist stereotypes concerning the role of an
individual in society. The masses' ability to offer resistance through self-organization
is thus diminished.
Given the effects
of such technologies, the "controlled chaos" actors are pursuing two
objectives:
1. Reducing the
size of the population by eliminating those who are not of use to the
architects of the new world order. Neoliberal reforms bring about a demographic
catastrophe by reducing birth rates and increasing death rates. The sexual
revolution, propaganda of hedonism, individualism, and consumerism reduce birth
rates. Social-Darwinism and indifference to the suffering of close ones deprive
people of their will to live and increase death rates. The large number of poor
and homeless people amounts to a de-facto euthanasia mechanism, as people in
these categories die quickly. Though more people are pulled down to replace
them.
2. The objective
of destroying a nation states by imposing control over them is intercepted by
transnational corporations, crime syndicates, supranational organizations and
institutions, which answer to those who employ controlled chaos technologies.
This task combines "soft power" with barbaric military aggression
(Yugoslavia, Iraq, and Libya). This process facilitates the aggressors' control
over the global financial, military, and information resources.
We should note
that the US and the EU economies grow not by increasing their output but by
reapportioning wealth between the strong and weak states. This is accomplished
by weakening the nation-state (usually by drawing it into a debt trap),
privatization, and buying up all manner of national assets, including natural
ones.
Under the
pressure of the financial institutions, the nation-state becomes a tool of this
type of globalization by privatizing and reducing expenditures on social needs
or on maintaining science and culture. States also organize mass illegal labor
migrations which render individual workers much cheaper which deprives them of
rights. In combination, the two tasks deprive the target state of its ability
to function as an international actor. It is a covert way of eliminating
economic competitors. The main symptoms of the loss of one's sovereignty
include the inability to perceive and interpret the situation, rise above it,
assert one's identity, and the ability to implement bold, breakthrough ideas.
[Comment: A
related phenomenon?
"The atrophy
of natural critical faculties with respect to pathological individuals becomes
an opening to their activities, and, at the same time, a criterion for
recognizing the association in concern as ponerogenic. Let us call this the first
criterion of ponerogenesis." –Lobaczewki]
As a result:
1. The state is
no longer self-governing, it does not have a development strategy, and it
cannot ensure decent living conditions for its citizens and guarantee
constitutional rights.
2. Corrupt
officials play a key role in controlling the economy and society.
3. The middle
class is disappearing, it is being disorganized, and alienated.
4. Political
parties and movements are mere facades.
5. Societal
movements have no actual effect on politics.
6. Citizens are
passive and have major identity problems (state, ethnic, family).
Let's look at a
few examples of controlled chaos implementation aimed at depriving foundations
of national independence.
1. Neutralizing
the drive to develop.
-Destruction of
state policy apparatus by seeding it with agents of influence.
-Infection
through corruption, promoting a cult of money.
-Government
bureaucratization.
-Removing the
scientific community from influencing the country's policies.
-Mythmaking:
"the market will fix everything."
2. Blocking the
reaction reflex
- Mass export of
cult organizations.
- Use of
political technologies in election campaigns.
- Transforming
the media into market actors.
- Promoting a
primitive mass culture.
3. Destroying
communications links
-
Individualization through neoliberalism, the atomization of society.
- Destroying
community ties.
- Destroying
transport networks.
- Promoting
ethnic and religious conflicts.
- Class
fragmentation into rich and poor class.
- Generational
conflict.
4. Reducing the
ability to influence events
- Use of
manipulative techniques in election campaigns.
- Promoting
neoliberal ideologies, such as individualism and atomization.
- Promoting the
cult of money and a system of primitive values.
- Shutting down
independent media.
- Promoting
corruption and criminalization.
5. Reducing the
ability to pursue development:
- Destroying
domestic science and educational progress.
- Promoting
deindustrialization through privatization, bankruptcy, and destruction of
professional training system.
- Elimination of
capital controls.
- Credit
dependence on international financial systems.
- Inability to
resist import dependence.
- Preventing the
society's active participation in the country's development.
In conclusion:
The US is
currently the main actor using "controlled chaos" tools with the aim
of seizing control over a country or region and preventing it from pursuing its
own development. Controlled chaos is de-facto neo-colonialism which transforms
countries into resource suppliers to the First World. It entails predatory
relations in trade and property acquisition.
Using controlled
chaos technologies runs against international norms of non-interference in
domestic affairs. It means there is a basis for banning and international
monitoring over controlled chaos technologies. Over the last several decades,
several countries were in favor of ensuring international information security
through legal agreements, now they could also initiate similar actions in
regard to controlled chaos technologies.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario