No es exagerado
decir que vivimos en uno de los momentos más peligrosos de la historia
contemporánea. Un Imperio en retirada intentando incendiar el mundo antes de
conceder cualquier retroceso, cualquier derrota. El sitio clave es Siria, sobre
todo los territorios al noreste del histórico Río Eufrates. Allí queda el
grueso de las tropas y mercenarios de la NATO intentando mantener la posición.
No les será sencillo: de todas partes avisan que no los quieren allí. Todo
puede suceder, chicos; todo. La nota que sigue es del sitio web Moon of
Alabama:
Título: Syria -
ISIS Is Defeated - The U.S. Is Next In Line
Texto: The
Islamic State in Syrian and Iraq is officially defeated. The UN resolution
which allowed other countries to fight ISIS within Syria and Iraq no longer
applies. But the U.S. military, despite the lack of any legal basis, wants to
continue its occupation of Syria's north-east. The attempt to do so will fail.
Its Kurdish allies in the area are already moving away from it and now prefer
Russian protection. Guerrilla forces to fight the U.S. "presence" are
being formed. The U.S. plan is shortsighted and stupid. If the U.S. insists on
staying there many of its soldiers will die.
Two days ago the
Syrian Arab Army closed the last gaps on the west bank of the Euphrates. Having
fought all the way from Aleppo along the river towards the east the Tiger Force
reached the liberated Deir Ezzor from the west. All settlements on the way are
now controlled by the Syrian government. The remaining Islamic State fighters
were pushed into the desert where they will be hunted down and killed.
Two days ago the
president of Russia, Vladimir Putin, declared a "complete victory" in
Syria:
“Two hours ago,
the (Russian) defense minister reported to me that the operations on the
eastern and western banks of the Euphrates have been completed with the total
rout of the terrorists,” Putin said.
“Naturally, there
could still be some pockets of resistance, but overall the military work at
this stage and on this territory is completed with, I repeat, the total rout of
the terrorists,” he said.
Today the Iraqi
Prime Minister Haider Abadi declared victory and the 'end of the war' against
ISIS on the Iraqi side:
"Our forces
are in complete control of the Iraqi-Syrian border and I therefore announce the
end of the war against Daesh (IS)," Abadi told a conference in Baghdad.
North of the
Euphrates the U.S. proxy force SDF had recently negotiated another agreement
(42) with the remaining Islamic State fighters there. ISIS allegedly handed
over a border crossing with Iraq to the SDF and in exchange was guaranteed free
passage through SDF controlled areas. This agreement came after an earlier one
in which the U.S. and SDF let 3,500 ISIS fighters flee from Raqqa to fight the
Syrian Army in Deir Ezzor. That was a U.S. attempt to delay or prevent the
victory of Syria and its allies. It failed.
Shortly after the
claimed new ceasefire between the U.S. SDF proxies and ISIS, Russian officers
met with officials of the Kurdish YPG, the central force of the SDF. The talks
completely changed the situation. In a joint press conference the Kurds and the
Russians committed to work together to fight ISIS east of the Euphrates. It
seems that the YPG is no longer convinced that the U.S. is willing to do so.
The Russians took command and the Russian air forces has since supported the
YPG in its fight against ISIS in Deir Ezzor governate on the eastern bank of
the river:
“A joint
operative staff has been created in the town of Es-Salhiya to provide direct
control and organize the cooperation with the popular militia units. Apart from
Russian advisors, representatives of the eastern Euphrates tribes are taken
part in it,” Poplavskiy said, noting that in the “coming days” the entire territory
east of Euphrates River will be free from terrorists.
Mahmoud Nuri, a
representative of the Kurdish YPG, stated that the militia “battled ISIS under
Russian command very effectively.” Kurdish forces have also expressed readiness
to ensure the safety of the Russian military specialists operating on the
eastern bank of the Euphrates River.
The U.S. is
seriously miffed that the Russians are suddenly supporting the U.S. proxy in
Syria's north-east. The U.S. wants to claim the area for itself. (It probably
also wants to protect the rest of ISIS there to reuse it when convenient.) The
U.S. claims that the Russian air support for the Kurds is violating
"coalition airspace".
The U.S. is not
invited to Syria but now claims airspace above the country? The Russians,
allied with the Syrian government, are invited to fly there. It is obvious who
has a sound legal justification to be in the area and who has not. But the U.S.
military hates to confront its own malice, and a competent adversary who knows
how to play chicken:
In one instance,
two Air Force A-10 attack planes flying east of the Euphrates River nearly
collided head-on with a Russian Su-24 Fencer just 300 feet away — a knife’s
edge when all the planes were streaking at more than 350 miles per hour. The
A-10s swerved to avoid the Russian aircraft, which was supposed to fly only
west of the Euphrates.
...
Since American
and Russian commanders agreed last month to fly on opposite sides of a 45-mile
stretch of the Euphrates to prevent accidents in eastern Syria’s increasingly
congested skies, Russian warplanes have violated that deal half a dozen times a
day, according to American commanders. They say it is an effort by Moscow to
test American resolve, bait Air Force pilots into reacting rashly, and help the
Syrian Army solidify territorial gains ahead of diplomatic talks aimed at
resolving the country’s nearly seven-year-old war.
ISIS is gone.
There is no justification for any "coalition airspace". Where please
is the "deal" that allows the U.S. to indefinitely occupy north-east
Syria as it now officially demands?
The Pentagon
plans to keep some U.S. forces in Syria indefinitely, even after a war against
the Islamic State extremist group formally ends, to take part in what it
describes as ongoing counterterrorism operations, officials said.
There are
approximately 2,000 U.S. troops in Syria, along with an unspecified number of
contractors supporting them. Last month, the U.S. military withdrew 400 Marines
from Syria, which U.S. forces first entered in the fall of 2016.
Officials earlier
this week disclosed the plans for an open-ended commitment, known as a
“conditions-based” presence.
...
The Pentagon has
said the forces will target parts of Syria that aren’t fully governed by either
regime or rebel forces. The military says it has the legal authority to remain
there.
The U.S. military
has lots of fantasies about "legal authority" and "deals".
We had already noted that such a "presence" in Syria is obviously
illegal. The fig leaf of a UN resolution 2249 to fight ISIS no longer applies.
Putin intentionally emphasized the "total rout of the terrorists" and
the "complete" victory to point that out. There is absolutely no
justification for the U.S. to stay. Moreover - the presence there is unsustainable.
The commander of
the paramilitary forces which support the Syrian and Iraqi government sent a
note to the U.S. to let it know that any remaining U.S. forces in Syria will be
fought down:
[T]he commander
of the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp Brigadier General Haj Qassem Soleimani
sent a verbal letter, via Russia, to the head of the US forces commander in
Syria, advising him to pull out all US forces to the last soldier “or the doors
of hell will open up”.
“My message to
the US military command: when the battle against ISIS (the Islamic State group)
will end, no American soldier will be tolerated in Syria. I advise you to leave
by your own will or you will be forced to it”, said Soleimani to a Russian
officer. Soleimani asked the Russian responsible to expose the Iranian
intentions towards the US: that they will be considered as forces of occupation
if these decide to stay in north-east Syria where Kurds and Arab tribes cohabit
together.
In 1983 U.S. and
French military barracks in Beirut were blown up after their forces had
intervened on one side of the Lebanese civil war. Several hundred soldiers
died. After the attack the U.S. pulled out of Lebanon. U.S. soldiers staying in
north-east Syria can now expect a similar fate.
The U.S. claims
that it has 2,000 soldiers in north-east Syria. This after it had claimed that
the number was 500. This new number was
announced after it had already pulled out 400 marines and it is still way too
low:
The updated
figure does not reflect troops assigned to classified missions and some Special
Operations personnel, Mr. Pahon said.
The U.S. had for
months claimed that it only had 500 soldiers in the area. It did not even
mention the contractors that follow its troops everywhere. The real number of
U.S. personnal must have been ten times as high as the official one. The new
official number is "2,000 and some".
The real new number is likely still above 3,500 plus several thousand
contractors. This revelation confirms again that the U.S. military lies
whenever and wherever it can.
The now remaining
"more than 2,000" will need tens of tons of supplies each day and the
U.S. has no secured supply line into north-east Syria. It is arrogant idiocy to
keep the troops there in place. A few roving guerillas can easily choke those
supplies. Each of the camps those troops occupy will be a target of external
and inside attacks.
The YPG Kurds are
already skipping out of their coalition with the U.S.. They are now making
friends with the Russians who provide them with air-support where the U.S.
wants to keep ISIS alive. How much longer will the U.S. soldiers in the YPG
controlled areas be able to trust their "allies"?
The Pentagon says
that the presence in Syria is “conditions-based” but it does not name any
condition that would have to be fulfilled for ending it. General Soleimani
seems to believe that a few hundred body bags arriving at Andrews airbase near
Washington, DC might be enough condition fulfillment to do the trick.
The situation in
other parts of Syria is largely unchanged. The various Takifiri groups in Idelb
governate continue to slaughter each other. The Syrian forces will likely hold
back their planned attacks into the area as long as their enemies there are
devouring each other. But a year from now Idelb, and north-east Syria, will
likely be back in the Syrian government's hand.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario